Employee not entitled to official immunity as asserted in summary judgement

University of the Incarnate Word v. Valerie Redus, et al., No.04-21-00115-CV, (Tex.App.—San Antonio, July 29, 2022) This appeal stems from a deadly force claim allegedly committed by a University of the Incarnate Word (“UIW”) police officer. UIW appealed a denial of its motion for summary judgment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed the denial. Student […]

Working in a concession stand at a recreational event is not “recreation” that would be covered by the recreational use statute.

  Special contributing author Laura Mueller, City Attorney for Dripping Springs City of Cleveland v. Macie Martin LaFrance and Penny Martin, 09-20-00189-CV, (Tex. App – Beaumont, June 9, 2022) (mem. op.). In this appeal from a trial court’s denial of the city’s plea to the jurisdiction and no evidence summary judgment, the city appealed that […]

Misuse of information in the operation of cemetery does not waive governmental immunity because operation of a cemetery is a governmental function.  

  Special contributing author Laura Mueller, City Attorney for Dripping Springs City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza, 13-21-00375-CV, (Tex. App – Corpus Christi – Edinburg, May 26, 2022) (mem. op.). In this appeal from a trial court’s denial of the city’s plea to the jurisdiction, the city […]

Texas Supreme Court holds demoted officers failed to submit proper Whistleblower report

City of Fort Worth v Abdul Pridgen and Vance Keyes, No. 20-0700 (Tex. May 27, 2022) In this Whistleblower lawsuit, the Texas Supreme Court held the city employees did not make a qualifying “report” to trigger protection.  The two employees (Pridgen and Keyes) were veteran law enforcement officers employed by the Fort Worth Police Department. […]

P&Z members immune from ultra vires actions from third parties in plat approval/denial proceedings

Josh Schroeder, et al. V Escalera Ranch Owners’ Association, Inc., No. 20-0855 (Tex. June 3, 2022) In this case, the Texas Supreme Court held individuals on the planning and zoning commission were entitled to immunity from ultra vires claims brought by third parties challenging a plat approval.  Escalera Ranch is a subdivision within the City […]

Texas Supreme Court holds city’s civil-enforcement of utility payment ordinance was not an unconstitutional taking

  City of Baytown v Alan Schrock, 20-0309 (Tex. May 13, 2022)  In this takings case, the Texas Supreme Court held the City of Bayton (City) did not commit a taking by withholding utility service in order to collect unpaid utility bills.   Schrock owned property that he would lease to tenants. The City’s ordinances […]

Texas Supreme Court holds general-law cities cannot impose a revenue-based licensing fee for construction trash haulers

  Builder Recovery Services, LLC v. The Town of Westlake, Texas, 21-0173, (Tex, May 20, 2022)  In this case, the Texas Supreme Court held that general law cities have limited authority to impose license fees for solid waste collections.   The Town of Westlake is a general-law municipality that imposed a percentage-of-revenue license fee on […]

First District Court of Appeals holds property owner could not bring a takings claim based on judicial order regarding substandard building

Jaime Jaramillo v. The City of Texas City, 01-20-00654-CV, (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.], Feb. 8, 2022, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). This is a takings case brought after the City initiated an enforcement action for a dilapidated building. The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the property owner’s claims. Jaramillo entered into […]

U.S. Supreme Court holds Austin on-premise/off-premise sign regulation is content neutral

Special contributing author Laura Mueller, City Attorney for Dripping Springs City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan Nat’l Advert. Of Austin, LLC., et al, No. 20-1029 (April 21, 2022). The primary question in regulating off-premise signs differently than on-premise signs is whether such a regulation implicates the First Amendment in a way that requires strict scrutiny […]