Subcontractor did not contract directly with DFW Airport, so no waiver of immunity exists for breach of contract, says Dallas COA
Ruth Torres v. Dallas/Ft Worth International Airport et. al, 05-18-00675-CV (Tex. App. — Dallas, August, 29, 2019).
This is a breach of contract case where the Dallas Court of Appeals held the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Torres was to provide human resources consulting services to Pursuit of Excellence (POE), a corporation that contracted with DFW to provide airport operations services. POE filed suit against Torres for breach of contract. Torres answered, counterclaimed, and attempted to bring in the Dallas/Ft.Worth International Airport (DFW). DFW filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which was granted. Torres appealed.
DFW is a special-purpose governmental entity which possesses immunity as a matter of law. As a result, Torres must establish a waiver of immunity to proceed. The Texas Tort Claims Act expressly lists the operating and regulation of an airport to be a governmental function, so no proprietary aspects are involved. Although TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE § 271.152 provides for a waiver of immunity in certain cases, that waiver is not absolute. Unfortunately for Torres, she did not contract with DFW, but with an independent contractor of DFW. The waiver under §271.152 applies only to contracts entered into directly with DFW. The remaining arguments asserted by Torres (UDJA, TOMA, PIA, etc.) were not raised at the trial court so cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. The plea was properly granted.
If you would like to read this opinion, click here. Panel consists of Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell. Opinion by Justice Myers.